1Yr·
10
23 Comments

profile image
The approach of determining the weighting according to market capitalization and GDP, combined with its factors, is interesting, but I do not see any long-term outperformance compared to a "normal" World ETF, if only because it allows a maximum weighting of 1% per company. It is precisely these large companies that have contributed to the good performance, or have grown so strongly that their weighting has become correspondingly large. If you reduce them, you cut the performance...
6
profile image
@TomTurboInvest not necessarily, like everything else it's speculation. Just because the giant companies have been growing faster in recent years doesn't mean it has to stay that way.
1
profile image
@leveragegrinding yes, it may well be, you only know afterwards 😉
profile image
This guy has harmed German investors and now he is taking the money out of their pockets.
3
profile image
@MiIliardenmehling
So far, the opinion has been that Kommer has contributed to the establishment of ETFs in Germany... You seem to disagree - can you tell us why?
3
profile image
@MiIliardenmehling Is there a legitimate reason for this?
3
profile image
So, what's it good for? 👍/👎
profile image
@Stullen-Portfolio The bottom line is that Red Flag is a solid all-in-one solution alongside ftse and co, just a little higher in terms of ter, but this may also decrease over time
1
profile image
@DividendenReiniger
Thanks for the summary...the conclusions immediately after the launch (at least those of the more "authoritative" reporters) were similar.
profile image
@DividendenReiniger
You used to be invested there too, didn't you? What prompted you to switch?
profile image
@Stullen-Portfolio Position was so small that it had no added value or sense, but will be available for election later as Acc when I have reached the tax-free amount
1
profile image
@DividendenReiniger
Ah, okay. Thank you.
profile image
puke with the guys
profile image
@IchPutzHierNur Strong justification.
1
profile image
@DividendenReiniger if you have a clue, you can see it in the videos, you don't need to "justify" anything at all
profile image
@IchPutzHierNur Why did I expect a "normal" explanation :D
1
profile image
@DividendenReiniger You're not serious, are you? Finanzfluss spreads misinformation on certain financial topics. Forex, pension products, P2P loans and much more. His site is also programmed solely to make money via affiliates, which works, and not to recommend honest products that don't make any money. Just watch the relevant videos and if you know anything about finance, which I assume you do, then you'll see what I mean.
Deleted User
1Yr
Comment was deleted
profile image
@PremiumSparkassler Exactly what I thought, TER is one of the most important parameters for me.
profile image
@RaphGM depends on what is important to you. As far as I know, Kommer focuses on uncorrelated assets, so his drawdown should be lower than with a standard ETF. But of course we will have to wait and see whether this works.
1
profile image
@PremiumSparkassler
"Ultra-diversification" is probably a difference to such normally diversified ETFs as ACWI etc., plus multi-factor, plus GDP, plus max share...🤷 Whether these are then ultimately actual advantages, nobody really knows...
1
profile image
@Stullen-Portfolio True, time will tell ... But 100 million in such a short space of time is pretty amazing. If that comes mainly from private investors, it shows how well known he is and how big his fan base is.
1
profile image
@randomdude
Joah, the conclusion could fit 👍
Join the conversation